{"id":2327,"date":"2017-08-15T04:00:57","date_gmt":"2017-08-15T11:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/salesfolk.com\/blog\/?p=2327"},"modified":"2017-08-15T06:05:55","modified_gmt":"2017-08-15T13:05:55","slug":"4-ways-business-continuity-sales-email-used-better-planning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/salesfolk.com\/blog\/4-ways-business-continuity-sales-email-used-better-planning\/","title":{"rendered":"4 Ways This \u2018Business Continuity\u2019 Sales Email Could Have Used Better Planning"},"content":{"rendered":"

Everyone loves a good tangent\u2014that is, if you\u2019re reading a science-fiction novel or listening to a story over happy hour.<\/span><\/p>\n

Cold emails, on the other hand, are one of the worst places to wander away from the main point of the message. You have literally seconds to grab the reader\u2019s attention with a sales email, and you won\u2019t do that with long, convoluted messages.<\/span><\/p>\n

This person apparently didn\u2019t get the memo when emailing me about disaster recovery and business continuity plans. See email #1, below:<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Email<\/a><\/p>\n

With a little more focus, the topic, why companies should plan for unexpected disasters, would be relevant to a lot of people out there. But there are multiple issues with this message that make it feel like less of a first cold email and more of an identity crisis. Let me explain:<\/p>\n

1. It wants to be sales email and marketing newsletter simultaneously.<\/b><\/h3>\n

The email starts with a potentially interesting fact: there\u2019s a difference between disaster recovery and business continuity. Now, it just so happens that understanding this difference is a current \u201chot topic\u201d in business, so maybe the sender has something to tell me about managing it (although I\u2019m probably not the most qualified lead for them, since we\u2019re still a lean startup).<\/span><\/p>\n

They don\u2019t. The email quickly becomes a marketing promotion that explains \u201cbusiness continuity\u201d with dramatic phrases like <\/span>\u201cessential to the future\u201d <\/span><\/i>and<\/span> \u201cstatistics don\u2019t lie.\u201d <\/span><\/i>Then we\u2019re told to download an e-book. What happened to that compelling fact the email started out with?<\/span><\/p>\n

Just because someone reads the first line of your email doesn\u2019t mean they\u2019ll finish it if you don\u2019t give them a good reason to. In this case, an interesting idea I\u2019d love to discuss gets waylaid with blatant product promotion. Not only does it leave me feeling confused, I also feel tricked.<\/span><\/p>\n

2. Multiple \u201cmain ideas\u201d are overwhelming.<\/b><\/h3>\n

In one email, the sender covers: the relationship between two areas of business, the definition of business continuity, the risk of not having a continuity plan, and why I should download the free e-book.<\/span><\/p>\n

Any given email in a campaign should stick to just one idea or value proposition. If you have more than one idea, that\u2019s when using a multi-touch email campaign comes into play. <\/span><\/p>\n

Alone, each of the above ideas would make a solid email. Thrown at the reader all at once, every one of them loses value, and we\u2019re left wondering what, exactly, the sender is trying to tell us.<\/span><\/p>\n

3. The information repeats itself.<\/b><\/h3>\n

Even riddled with multiple ideas, the email still manages to club us over the head with the same statement: you better plan for disaster, or your company will meet an untimely end. Although disasters do happen, saying it four different ways tends to diminish the effectiveness of the statement. <\/span><\/p>\n

A much stronger way to highlight this fact would be an opening line like, <\/span>\u201cDid you know that 73% of companies without a business-continuity plan fold when a cyber-disaster strikes?\u201d \u00a0<\/span><\/i>The number alone would frighten most of us into action, or at least into hitting the \u201creply\u201d button, but there are plenty of other openers that would work as well.<\/span><\/p>\n

4. There are multiple calls to action.<\/b><\/h3>\n

The sender has a few different requests: download a product, consider having a conversation with them, and to send an email or make a phone call. That\u2019s too much to ask a stranger over one cold email.<\/span><\/p>\n

The email would have closed much stronger had there been one simple call to action that didn\u2019t require much thought: <\/span>\u201cLet\u2019s talk about preparing your business for the unexpected. When do you have 10 minutes next week?\u201d <\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

That doesn\u2019t make the other calls to action, like the e-book download, unusable. This is one of the reasons eight-touch email campaigns are so important. They give you a chance to offer different kinds of call to actions to see what works best.<\/span><\/p>\n

5. It gives too much away in the follow-up message.<\/b><\/h3>\n

Email #1 didn\u2019t provide any real value, and email #2 seems determined to make up for that by giving away more than any company should realistically share for free:<\/span><\/p>\n

Email #2:<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Email<\/a><\/p>\n

The second email gets one fact right: business continuity <\/span>is<\/span><\/i> a daunting task. But the length and detail in this email don\u2019t make it any less cumbersome. We don\u2019t need to see all six steps of the planning process in a single email. While this may be appropriate in a slide deck during a meeting, none of this belongs in an email to a stranger. Not to mention, providing all six steps and a free ebook removes a lot of the incentive to respond to this email.<\/span><\/p>\n

The moral of the story? Be mindful of how much value you\u2019re giving away over a sales email. Give too little, and recipients will instantly forget your email\u2014if they open it at all. Too much, and they\u2019ll bypass your expertise and get the job done themselves for free. <\/span><\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>