• How We Work
    • About
    • Our Processes
  • Customers
  • Content
    • Blog
    • Hall of Shame
    • Guides
  • Cold Email Academy
    • Become a “SalesFolk Certified” Copywriter
    • Cold Email Mastery Course
    • SalesFolk Premium Member Login
  • Jobs

Avoid Sending Email Disasters Like These 5 Poorly Targeted Sales Messages

March 21, 2018 By Jennifer Marston Leave a Comment

Vague, suspect messages. False compliments. A subject line that’s almost too absurd to seem real. These are just a few of the gems in this month’s roundup of shame-worthy emails. If I had to draw one thread connecting all five of these messages, it would be the dangers of spamming a huge list of poorly targeted leads with irrelevant emails, or sending emails that are so general they’ll apply to anyone (or no one).

Behold, our latest SalesFolk Hall of Shame roundup:

1. Formatting Fred

Crimes: excessive and arbitrary formatting, too long

Where to begin? This is basically a marketing brochure the sender tried to turn into a sales email by tacking some empty pleasantries onto the beginning of the message. And that crime pales in comparison to the formatting issues here.

After reading up on what this company does and seeing the business mentioned by reputable publications, I was somewhat intrigued. But I had to do a lot of my own work to get to that place. Here at SalesFolk, it’s our business to thoroughly examine cold email, but the average recipient wouldn’t even be able to get past the links, bold fonts, italicized fonts, bold-italicized fonts, and bullet-point lists. So this email is a really good example of how a compelling product, service, or company can get lost if the sender spends more time focusing on cosmetic adjustments to the text than on communicating benefits to recipients. 

2. Mr. Sketch

Crimes: vague, empty words, lack of information

Hall of Shame March 2

Vague emails aren’t sketchy by definition, but in the case of this one, the lack of information definitely makes one raise an eyebrow: “an Agency,” “growth opportunities,” “errors.” Maybe I wouldn’t have questioned the legitimacy if I hadn’t Googled this company’s URL and gotten a Page Not Found with that little frowning face, not to mention an address that doesn’t actually have a building, according to Maps.

And even if it is a legitimate email, it’s too vague to be enticing in any possible way. Moving on . . .

Mr Sketch

3. The Aloof Recruiter

Crimes: detached tone, lack of details

HoS 3

I know it’s normal that recruiters don’t always include the company name in their initial emails, but this message seems to be actively trying to not include any useful details. What size company is it? Where is the job located? What do you actually know about my previous experience that’s led you to reach out?

When a sender withholds as many details as they’ve done here, it’s practically impossible to get excited about the message. After all, it’s hard to imagine yourself fitting in at a company that needs “various C-level positions.” My guess is that this is a mass, un-researched list sent by someone looking to fill a quota. Unfortunately, that tactic rarely gets responses.

Hos 4

4. The Performer

Crimes: putting on an act, obscuring the message

Hall of Shame 4

Most of us at SalesFolk are, in fact, invested in social issues, but we tend to keep those pretty separate from our work lives and avoid talking about our views anywhere on the company website. That unfortunately renders the opening line of this email a completely false pleasantry. A better tactic would have been to turn that assumption into a question: “Has SalesFolk ever considered investing in a worthy cause?”

The false tone continues throughout the rest of the email with phrases like “make your values visible” and “changing the lives of artists.” No one talks that way in a real conversation. This email is pure performance.

Hos 5

5. The Slacker

Crimes: that subject line . . .

HoS 5

Yes, that subject line is real. And yes, it was probably a mistake, which is yet another lesson in why proofreading is so important for cold email.

The Slacker shows up in some form almost every time we do this roundup. This time, it’s another case of marketing emails parading as sales messages. In other words, we didn’t opt into this email. More importantly, this highly un-targeted email tells me nothing about this event—what I’ll learn, why the topic is important. It’s just a list of speaker names, which the sender already included in the world’s longest subject line ever.

Never assume a recipient has seen previous emails sent. There are dozens of reasons why they may not have, so it’s best to make every email in a campaign tell it’s own complete story with all the necessary details.

Slacker

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Email

Filed Under: Hall of Shame

Managing a Remote Team? Make Sure You’re Doing These 4 Things

February 14, 2018 By Jennifer Marston Leave a Comment

Here’s a question that’s going to become more and more relevant over the next decade: How do you manage employees when you’re working with a remote team?

When I started SalesFolk, one of the first things I made sure to do was create definite ideas around how employees would communicate and collaborate remotely, whether with me or one another, in groups or one on one. Today, we have over 40 people working for the company, all of them completely comfortable with a culture that’s built on remote collaboration to get work done.

As more work moves online and more companies rely on a geographically distributed teams, managing remote work should be a priority, especially if your goal is to one day be a manager or executive.

So with that in mind, check out our latest video, which explores four things you can do to effectively manage remote teams.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Email

Filed Under: Outbound Sales

If Your Sales Emails Look Like This, You’re Definitely Losing Potential Customers

February 7, 2018 By Jennifer Marston Leave a Comment

There was something undeniably frustrating about putting together this month’s Hall of Shame roundup. Maybe it was the sheer amount of information to pick through, or the awful formatting choices. How, one can’t help but wonder, do messages like these make it out of draft and into someone’s inbox?

People often mistake length for strength in a sales email, cramming as many features as they can into annoying bullet-point lists. Or they go the opposite direction, thinking an extra-general email will appeal to anyone and get more responses. It won’t. And in both cases, a crucial element is missing: the prospective customer and their business needs and wants.

Behold, February’s lineup of terrible cold emails:

1. Factory of Features

Crimes: length, mistaking people for features

Artificial Intelligence

You want to know the worst part about a feature list? When the items aren’t even actual features.

At quick glance, this looks like just another list of product capabilities (that’s inexplicably written in blue font). Closer inspection reveals it’s actually a list of employee types along with their tenure at the company. I realize the sender refers to these roles as “resources,” and sure, you can, technically, sell resources. But people are not faceless features. Treating them as such in a sales email just suggests you run the digital equivalent of a factory.

Conversations builds sales relationships, so make your text conversational. The best way to do this is to read out loud what you’ve written. If your voice drones on like a .matrix printer as you read, you might want to revise a couple times.

Factory Peeps

2. The Formatting Mess

Crimes: length, pointless formatting

Mess

I can’t decide which of this email’s crimes is more overwhelming: the enormous amount of information or the gratuitous amount of formatting.

In the span of one email, the sender covers: automation, stats from a new report, the role of salespeople in the digital age, and the job descriptions of multiple people. Laced throughout is arbitrary bold-faced font and the dreaded bullet-point list. To be fair, they did put a space between the paragraphs and bullet-point lists, which makes this email marginally more readable.

With only seconds to keep a reader’s attention, it’s crucial to be as clear as possible about what you want. The formatting issues combined with the numbers, names, and features, this email is just a mess begging to be cleaned up.

The Mess

3. The Bridge Burner

Crimes: length, untargeted, too many ideas

Bridge Burner

Its admirable this person wants to “bridge the gap” between Academia and Industry, but they’re not going to do it with an email this long.

Sales emails should be all about the other person, not a bullet-point list of your company’s history and accomplishments. Those may boost your credibility, but they’re better left for a phone call or, better yet, an in-person meeting where there’s time to go a little bit off-topic. As far as the list of what I’d be responsible for, it’s more in-depth than most job descriptions on LinkedIn. In other words, it looks like a hell of a lot of work and I don’t want to read about it in a sales email.

The goal of any good sales email is to make the recipient’s life easier, not more tiring. Pick a single idea and stick to it throughout, or you’ll wind up burning a lot more bridges than you build.

The Bridge Burner

4. ???

Crimes: completely un-targeted, utterly random

Random

I had to block out the names here, but suffice to say, a flower delivery company sent this, and the website the sender thinks is mine is actually a lead-generation site, which SalesFolk is not. Talk about a mass, un-targeted email. Then there’s the bit about “searching for moms.”

So we have flowers, lead generation, and parenthood in a single email. Combined, what lesson do they offer? That you should check your CRM data and take time to research your contacts before hitting the send button.

Un-targeted

5. You Had One Job

Crimes: length, faking an acquaintance

Job Description

This is one of several emails we received from this company, yet no one at SalesFolk has actually ever talked to the sender.

And for an email sent by a stranger, this one asks me to do an awful lot of work: pass the message to someone else if the content’s not relevant to me, answer a bunch of questions, and read through an enormous amount of text.

There’s nothing wrong with sending a cold email to gauge someone’s interest in employment, but you won’t get many responses if you post the entire job description in the actual email. For one, it kills any intrigue you might have created by holding some details back. And this much information is really just another form of a feature list. As we’ve discussed, over and over and over this week, features don’t sell, even when you’re the one offering to pay.

You Had One Job

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Email

Filed Under: Hall of Shame Tagged With: cold emails, feature lists, Hall of Shame

Want More Responses to Your Cold Emails? Avoid These 6 Forms of Self-Obsession

January 17, 2018 By Jennifer Marston Leave a Comment

Come up with any good New Year’s resolutions yet? Here’s a thought: if you’ve ever committed one of the six cold email sins below, avoid repeating those mistakes in the future.

These email personalities showcase a variety of problems—self-obsession, laziness, ridiculously long messages—but they have one thing in common. They do nothing to make the reader feel valued.

Making a recipient feel like 1 of 1,000 is a surefire way to turn them off. Sometimes, this is unintentional, like forgetting to personalize a message. Other times, it’s blatant and obnoxious, such as outlining your thoughts on random topics that have nothing to do with the sender’s business. And sometimes, pointless formatting is to blame. Whatever the reason, these messages are perfect examples of how lack of focus on the sender will ruin an email.

Without further ado, here are our latest Hall of Shame personas to avoid.

1. The Mad Libber

Crimes: infomercial-quality writing, zero personalization

January Hall of Shame 1

There are a bunch of issues with this email (copy errors, features instead of benefits), but what really stands out is its overly general, infomercial-like quality.

Lines like “. . . we take the time, headache, and frustration out of finding a business loan . . .” sound as if they belong on a roadside billboard—or in a book of Mad Libs, with certain words removed: “we take the [noun], [noun], and [noun] out of [verb ending in ing] a business loan.”

Meanwhile, the intended market here is more general than a TV audience from the 1990s. The email assumes pretty much any business has cashflow problems, then offers a list of features that address substantially different financial needs.

Extra-general sentences and information is perfect when you’re Mad Libbing around the Christmas tree with family. When it comes to cold email, it’s a one-way ticket to the trash.

The Mad Libber

2. Mr. Robot

Crimes: stiff language, vague requests and benefits

 

January Hall of Shame 2

This email is all about asking me for things without revealing anything about who the sender is, what they do, or where my proposed article would eventually wind up.

The vagueness doesn’t stop there, though. “I was made aware of your blog post here” only directs me to a website of marketing links and no mention of SalesFolk anywhere. Then there’s “ . . . publish blogs that are related to the business industry.” Business is not an industry, technically. Even if you bent that rule, you’d still be left wondering which aspect of business this sender is referring to. Sales? Writing? Shoe manufacturing?

Personal pet peeve: the sentence length here is almost perfectly uniform, which suggests Siri actually wrote this email. If you want to keep your reader’s attention, vary sentence length to keep the flow natural.

Mr. Robot

3. The Disaster

Crimes: misleading copy, poor grammar, sloppy style  

January Hall of Shame 3

Under no circumstances should you ever kick off a cold email by joking about a religious figure. And that’s the lightest of this email’s crimes. More concerning is the complete mess that makes up the rest of the copy.

There’s no consistent punctuation to speak of, only a jumble of commas and colons. Lines like “No, we are not trying to sell anything, no we don’t have any other schemes up our sleeves, please bear with me 1 more second of your time” make me think the sender did a brain dump straight into the email and never followed it with a proofread.

Speaking of “no schemes up our sleeves,” this entire email is a scheme, just a badly masked one. It’s totally trying to push something on me (getting my feedback), despite claims to the contrary. Though, honestly, I don’t think this person meant to be deceptive. This email is more a case of disorganized thoughts, poor copy, and too many ideas packed into a single message.

The Disaster

4. The Pretender

Crimes: empty sentences, no benefits, potentially misleading claims

 

January Hall of Shame 4

The Pretender is a cousin to The Slacker—they never put much effort into their cold emails. But unlike their cousin, who doesn’t care what you think, The Pretender really wants you to believe they’ve gone above and beyond for you.

Like most pretenders, this one doesn’t do a very good job of masking their laziness. The message is full of empty, obvious information (“I would love to introduce myself”). The subject line speaks for itself in terms of quality. And the message also promises me a list of technical errors on my site, but gives no clues as to what those errors might be. I’m inclined to believe the 12-page doc promised doesn’t actually exist yet, and that it’s mentioned in the email because that sounds nice.

In cold email, where you have seconds to capture a person’s attention, every single word counts. Set aside time for checking your work—often more than once—before you send it out. When someone’s too lazy to take those steps, it usually shows.

PS: What’s with the green line of text in the middle?

The Pretender

5. Ms. Vain

Crimes: long-winded, self-focused

January Hall of Shame 5

This email should be about a quarter of the length it is currently. But when you spend a bunch of time talking about yourself, the words are bound to pile up.

The only parts of this email acknowledging my existence is that the sender came across us and that we’re invited pay a lot of money to test out their service. I can buy a farming robot for my backyard for $3,000; why would I spend that money on someone who doesn’t take the time to ask me why I might need their PR services?

It’s great that this particular company has gotten accolades from some high-profile publications. That isn’t the same thing as including good social proof, which, in cold email, uses past success stories and stats to entice the potential customer. Listing NYT and Wired in this context only makes the email sound more self-obsessed, and is as empty as telling someone you came across their company.

Vain

6. Clueless

Crimes: random, irrelevant information, hypocrisy

January Hall of Shame 6

Part of the trouble here is the email’s length: it’s the digital equivalent of the guy at the party who won’t stop talking about himself.

But even half as long, this message would still come off as obnoxious and self obsessed. Because like the guy at the party, who will talk about anything just to hear the sound of his own voice, this sender strings a bunch of unrelated topics into an email without any apparent purpose. What do cryptocurrencies, digital spreadsheets, and a forthcoming book have in common? I don’t know, based on this email.

Finally, the email ends with “networking advice” and an instruction to “stay focused.” You’ve heard the mantra practice what you preach? Clearly, this person didn’t.

Clueless

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Email

Filed Under: Hall of Shame

6 Cold Email Crimes That Will Land Your Message and Reputation in the Trash

December 20, 2017 By Jennifer Marston Leave a Comment

We get tons of cold emails over here at SalesFolk, but they’re not all created equal in terms of quality. For every enticing message that lays out clear benefits and asks helpful questions, there are 10 that commit email crimes like laziness, being too self-focused, or asking us to do all the work.

While it would be nice to never get emails like these at all, they do offer some great real-world lessons for salespeople, marketers, and anyone interested in attracting customers over email.

As part of our SalesFolk Hall of Shame, we’ve collected some of the most offensive cold email personalities to grace our inboxes recently, and called them out for their crimes. For a lesson in what not to do, read on:

1. The Flatterer

Email Crimes: insincerity, false flattery

The Flatterer

Imitation is not always flattery. This person uses one of Heather’s old cold email templates from a few years back, but completely butchers it. “Quick question” is way overused as a subject line now, and it’s also misleading, since the message that follows is anything but quick.

And speaking of flattery: this person needs a lesson in how to make it sound convincing. The opening pleasantry screams of false concern. The paragraph that follows it is nothing more than a thinly disguised setup for the sender’s real intentions, which is to talk about their creative agency.

If given the choice, I would rather someone drop me three lines of text asking outright if I need creative services, rather than assume I’m not smart enough to see through fake niceties.

2. The Entitled Recruiter

Email Crimes: laziness, creating extra work

Occasionally, we get excited about a cold email and include too many asks in one message.

This email goes to new extremes. The sender doesn’t just accidentally include a long CTA or one too many questions. They expect the recipient to complete multiple steps in order to even get to the so-called benefit: read this job description; reply if they’re interested; reply if they’re not interested; submit names of other potential candidates.

Long story short, the sender wants the recipient to do the work. They clearly haven’t properly researched relevant candidates, and instead, expect that and all other useful information to come from others. This is the sort of email that won’t just annoy people; it could outright offend them.

Entitiled

3. The Slacker

Email Crimes: laziness, lack of research

This one reads like it was written at 5 p.m. on a Friday when the sender realized they were a few outbound emails short of their weekly requirement.

Everything in here could apply to just about any recipient, whether that’s a VP of B2B Software Sales or someone working at the Nike flagship store. Seriously, what company doesn’t prospect or do lead generation? Who doesn’t want to “rapidly grow their sales?”

On top of that, the text is full of obvious typos and grammatical errors that add an extra layer of unprofessionalism. One glance at this message, and people will move on.

4. The Marketing Bot

Email Crimes: lack of personalization, marketing disguised as sales

This would be a relatively inoffensive message—if the sender had simply made it a marketing promotion instead of trying to convince me it’s a cold sales email.

Besides covering way too much information for one email, this message completely lacks the kind of personal touches that make cold email successful. There are no benefits, just a gratuitous feature list. And using “Heather R” in the name field immediately gives away the game: I’m one of probably 1,000 names scraped out of a CRM and thrown into a marketing-automation tool.

There is definitely a time and place for marketing promotions. As part of a cold email campaign isn’t one of them.

Pro tip: always clean up your CRM data before you send your messages.

5. The Jargon Specialist

Email Crimes: vague, relies on jargon, sloppy

“CRM Specialist” definitely pops up on LinkedIn now and then as an actual job title—but that doesn’t mean we should go around using it with total strangers. The phrase is business jargon at its finest: vague, pretentious, and not descriptive of any real job at a company. Presumably, anyone using a CRM in their day-to-day work is a kind of specialist.

The rest of the message is just as vague. It doesn’t tell me why this mysterious candidate might be a good fit for my company or what skills they can bring to the ones I already employ. Finally, the text is messy, with bland, redundant wording and a couple of typos that should never wind up in any kind of email, cold or not.

Jargon

6. The Desperate Wannabe

Email Crimes: trying too hard, too much information

The Wannabe

This person really, really wants to come off as one of those warm, bubbly types you just can’t help but reply to. But a salutation that reads “Hey!” just screams that the sender wants to appear chill when they are actually desperate for a response.

Then there are the multiple links to promotional materials, along with three different CTAs that aren’t so much about my taking action as they are about the sender wanting to seem cheerful. Had they spent more time cleaning up run-on sentences and outlining why I could benefit from animation videos, I might have been more interested in the product.

Wannabes

Seen any other cringeworthy cold email stereotypes that deserve a place in our Hall of Shame roundup? Send them to [email protected] for consideration. The weirder/wackier the cold email “personality” nominated, the better.

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Email

Filed Under: Hall of Shame

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Get Sales Email Tips

Subscribe to our newsletter and learn the secrets to writing magnetic emails that start genuine conversations.

Recent Posts

  • Why blindly copying email templates NEVER works!
  • 3 Cold Email Mistakes That Ruin Sales Conversations
  • Avoid Sending Email Disasters Like These 5 Poorly Targeted Sales Messages
  • ClearSlide’s Latest Sales Email Is Murky. Here’s How to Fix It
  • Quick Fixes That Will Get This Prospecting Email More Responses

Categories

  • Benchmarking Sales Metrics
  • Email Deliverability
  • Hall of Shame
  • Interviews
  • Outbound Sales
  • Persuasive Writing
  • Sales Automation & Acceleration
  • Sales Prospecting
  • Uncategorized

Be a goat, not a sheep!

We always strive to create captivating copy that is unique, actionable and adds value to prospects’ lives.

Want help with your cold emails? Request a call:


Copyright Salesfolk 2017 | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.